Hi Ivan,
very nice. This makes the calculations faster indeed since we only have
to look at the new events.
As for the rating, the mimetype, and any other score parameters: we
could put those in another score which almost never changes (at least
not over time). Then selecting the final score is as simple as:
select (s1*s2) as score where { ?r nao:score ?s1 . ?r nao:score2 ?s2 . }
What do you think of that? It is a bit hacky but should make the process
much faster again.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 07/28/2010 06:52 PM, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> Here's the proposal for the new scoring formula.
>
> If you are not able to read .tex or .dvi, you can get the .pdf from here:
> http://poincare.math.rs/~ivan/files/other/scoring.pdf
>
> ---
> Not related to the above part:
>
> We need unique rating for every activity. Any ideas about how to do
> that in a simple way?
>
>
> Cheerio,
> Ivan
>
> --
> While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words
> Dying to believe in what you heard
> I was staring straight into the shining sun
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
