> select (s1*s2) as score where { ?r nao:score ?s1 . ?r nao:score2 ?s2 . }
>
> What do you think of that? It is a bit hacky but should make the process
> much faster again.It is ok. One question though, can we do this: select (s1 * exp(d) * s2 as score ...) That is, do virtuoso support exp? If yes, we will not need to constantly update the score. > > Cheers, > Sebastian > > On 07/28/2010 06:52 PM, Ivan Čukić wrote: >> Here's the proposal for the new scoring formula. >> >> If you are not able to read .tex or .dvi, you can get the .pdf from here: >> http://poincare.math.rs/~ivan/files/other/scoring.pdf >> >> --- >> Not related to the above part: >> >> We need unique rating for every activity. Any ideas about how to do >> that in a simple way? >> >> >> Cheerio, >> Ivan >> >> -- >> While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words >> Dying to believe in what you heard >> I was staring straight into the shining sun >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nepomuk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > -- While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words Dying to believe in what you heard I was staring straight into the shining sun _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
