Another small issue concerning the pimo ontology. When I convert an item of the type Nepomuk::Vocabulary::PIMO::Task() to Nepomuk::Vocabulary::PIMO::Note() and I keep the same Nepomuk::Thing, I obviously have to set the new type on the Nepmuk::Thing, right?
It seems a bit strange since the Nepomuk::Thing I supposed to "represent a uniqe concept/idea". I mean it does make sense somehow since the information stored in the Task/Note is exactly the same, but the semantics change a bit. Anway I have no clue If changing the Thing can have any sideffects. It's more that I'm interested, than that I'm facing technical problems =). So far at least ;-) Cheers, Chris _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
