Hi Chris, I do not really follow. You want to change the type of a thing but keep all the contents? This seems totally fine to me.
Cheers Sebastian On 02/14/2011 07:26 PM, Christian Mollekopf wrote: > > Another small issue concerning the pimo ontology. > > When I convert an item of the type Nepomuk::Vocabulary::PIMO::Task() to > Nepomuk::Vocabulary::PIMO::Note() and I keep the same Nepomuk::Thing, I > obviously have to set the new type on the Nepmuk::Thing, right? > > It seems a bit strange since the Nepomuk::Thing I supposed to "represent a > uniqe concept/idea". I mean it does make sense somehow since the information > stored in the Task/Note is exactly the same, but the semantics change a bit. > > Anway I have no clue If changing the Thing can have any sideffects. > > It's more that I'm interested, than that I'm facing technical problems =). So > far at least ;-) > > Cheers, > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
