Hi Simon, CC'ing [email protected] since that is where ontology related stuff is discussed (if there is no ticket).
On 09/05/2011 06:41 PM, Simon Scerri wrote: > While having a look at the ontology elements that have been introduced > since Nepomuk, Keith has noticed the following apparent inconsistencies. > > > NEXIF: > > - nexif:pixelXDimension. Current range is xsd:string, whereas > nexif:pixelYDimension points to xsd:integer > > - nexif:relatedImageWidth. Current range is xsd:string, whereas > nexif:relatedImageLength points to xsd:integer Most ranges in NExif are string and, thus, broken. I did not find the mental energy to fix those yet. But they have been broken from the very beginning. I would be very grateful for any patches fixing some of the ranges (just create a ticket and I will approve or even push it or if you do not have an SF account yet just send me the patch and I do the rest.) > PIMO: > > -pimo:duration. Is there a valid reason why the current range is > rdf:Resource rather than xsd:duration? No idea. This is still from the "olden" days. CC'ing Leo for this one. xsd:duration seems the more logical choice indeed. > If there are no explanations for the above, we can initiate > corresponding tickets. Cool, thanks. :) Cheers, Sebastian _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
