Hi Daniele, thanks for your interest. I've had a look at the BIBI, Cito, Swrc and BibTex in owl ontology.
But it does look like owl is not well supported in nepomuk and it seems it cause more problems after all. The general approach is to create an ontology inside nepomuk respecting the NRL and create a bridge back to owl and others (at least that is how I understood the documentation in [1]). Or NRL should add support for all the missing features in nepomuk, and I'm happy to reuse BIBO in this case :) Regards, Joerg [1] http://oscaf.sourceforge.net/nie.html#nie:sec-nrl _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
