On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:53 AM, David Narvaez <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi, > > I took on the task of migrating Nepomuk Shell to Nepomuk2. Thanks a lot. I've been meaning to do it for sometime now, but it's not exactly trivial. We need to redesign it as well, but lets discuss that later / in another thread. I applied > the script found in the wiki[0] and I'm left with these questions: > > 1. What's a Thing now? By matching methods, I guess it is a Resource, > right? > Yup > 2. When creating a new class, there's a line that reads > Nepomuk2::Types::Class base( Nepomuk2::Vocabulary::PIMO::Thing() ); > Should that be replaced too? > The 'Thing' is an abstract concept in the ontologies that certain real-world stuff is derived from. We use to have special handling for "it" in nepomuk1, but since we never used it in anything that was shipped, I decided to remove it. The Vocabularies stay the same, so they shouldn't be removed. > 3. What replacements are there for the old Utils namespace? For > instance, Nepomuk Shell uses SimpleResourceModel, is there any > replacement for that? > Right now, I think it would be better if you just copied the models you need and move them to the Nepomuk2 namespace as well. > > Thanks. > > David E. Narváez > > [0] http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/Nepomuk2Port > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > -- Vishesh Handa
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
