On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:25 PM, David Narvaez <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Vishesh Handa <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 3. What replacements are there for the old Utils namespace? For > >> instance, Nepomuk Shell uses SimpleResourceModel, is there any > >> replacement for that? > > > > > > Right now, I think it would be better if you just copied the models you > > need and move them to the Nepomuk2 namespace as well. > > Did that, and after a couple of changes I manged to compile and run > Nepomuk Shell, the patch is in the ReviewBoard. Now I have another set > of questions - more like confirmations, since it already runs etc. > > 1. (An easy one) Methods like resourceType() and resourceUri() are > now type() and uri() right? > Yup > 2. In CMake, it looks like in the old Nepomuk you could > find_package(Nepomuk REQUIRED) and then include(SopranoAddOntology) > but in Nepomuk2 I had to find_package(NepomukCore REQUIRED) and also > find_package(Soprano REQUIRED) to include(SopranoAddOntology), am I > correct? > Yup > > I think I had one more question but I can't remember... Anyhow, thanks > for your answers, and we can follow up with the patch itself in the > ReviewBoard. > > David E. Narváez > -- Vishesh Handa
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
