----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108149/#review24623 -----------------------------------------------------------
I don't think this is a good idea. Well, not the way it has been done. It would be better if this was transparently handled by the FileIndexerConfig, and it not be saved in the config file. If we do not save it in the config file then we don't need to have a special case for it in the KCM. Also, considering that that this "data" directory is generally present in a hidden folder. I'm not sure if this will work. Did you test it? - Vishesh Handa On Jan. 3, 2013, 10:34 p.m., Luis Silva wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108149/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 3, 2013, 10:34 p.m.) > > > Review request for Nepomuk, Vishesh Handa and Sebastian Trueg. > > > Description > ------- > > Add the $HOME/.kde/share/apps/nepomuk/data folder to be indexed by default. > Most of the kios I am writing depend on this, especially since the webminer > saves the data to this folder. > This is similar to what the tvnamer does. > > > Diffs > ----- > > services/fileindexer/fileindexerconfig.cpp > 0e0e4aead7b422980d4c1713f52de4269c0e4f8e > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108149/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > I am not sure if this is the correct way to do it but since the webminer > saves all its data here by defailt, any consumers need to have the data > indexed (level 2). > > > Thanks, > > Luis Silva > >
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
