But what about my question? Will Tenable be taking legal action against companies violating the license agreement on copyrighted plug-ins? You can't expect others to take the license seriously if you don't hold violators accountable.
In addition, how do you expect me to take your company seriously when you respond to email in such a manner. You guys are the ones changing the game here, so if you want to maintain your formally loyal user base, then you need to adequately sell us on these changes. -----Original Message----- From: Renaud Deraison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: questions regarding new plugin policy On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 08:06:20AM -0800, Hyland Jeremy J CONT KPWA wrote: > It would seem to me that there are far more legitimate users then license > violators out there. So Tenable's actions to try an stop the few will end up > just annoying the many. I'm probably a very dumb person, so please explain to me how an OPTIONAL two-step process (registering your email then using the activation code) is annoying to "the many". If you're not happy with the plugin policy, then DON'T DO ANYTHING, and your current nessus-update-plugins will continue to fetch the GPL plugins automagically for you. A constructive answer will probably be more useful than a random rant, thank you. -- Renaud _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
