Renaud Deraison wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 12:52:39PM -0800, M J wrote:
Hi,
Based on what I have read in GPLv2, I'm coming to the
conclusion ANYTHING written in NASL should be GPL.
This is correct. However, as the copyright holder of NASL, Tenable
can grant itself an exception in that regard.
Why would code written in nasl have to be gpled? I think it is pretty
commonly accepted that interpreting code with a GPLed interpreter
doesn't make the code GPLed. I must be missing something
--
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful - and so are we
They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people -
and neither do we.
-- George W. Bush
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
