I do thank you for that.

YARICK wrote:
> very well, I did not the that it was answered and was trying to be
> helpful to you.
>
>
> On Jan 10, 2008 11:27 AM, Cordell Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> My question was answered yesterday actually by George Theall. Nessus
>> should not categorize information findings as low because when a
>> certification document that asks for the evidence/outcome, you would
>> have to justify that some of the lows on the report are actually
>> informational. Now the nessus scanner I use on a Linux machine marks
>> them as informational but not the Windows version. They need to be
>> synced up. Yarick thank you for your response and I do know that this
>> mailing list is not a replacement for customer support and I do not
>> think that this was a customer support related question. A customer
>> support related question would be about the scanner it self and/or the
>> Security Center.
>>
>>
>> YARICK wrote:
>>     
>>> Cordel, yes, you are missing some information. Your question is not
>>> specific enough to be answered and will probably be ignored unless you
>>> provide more details such as exact version number of Nessus scanner
>>> and the operating system you are running it on. Last will help to
>>> identify if there is an issue with Nessus version you are running
>>> and/or if the report configuration has to be modified.  If you provide
>>> the target-system configuration people with similar problem will
>>> respond with suggestions on how to adjust your scanning configuration
>>> to report on the vulnerabilities seen. This mailing list is not a
>>> replacement for the customer support and customer support related
>>> questions have to be addressed to the customer support.  I hope this
>>> was helps you to adjust your problem solving strategies.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 9, 2008 8:44 AM, Cordell Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> I have a question about nessus results that I have. It says I have 6 low
>>>> severity vulnerabilities but no where on the report shows what these 6
>>>> low severity vulnerabilities are. Am I missing something?
>>>>
>>>> Cordell
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nessus mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>
>
>
>   
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

Reply via email to