On 30/04/2020 12:15, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
I don't understand your comment. Maybe I'm missing something?
That's exactly what DSF is isn't it?
We just choose to name the method 'open' instead of 'get'.
And the static `DSF of(DSF)` method is simply there to provide
a type witness and avoid a cast (you get a compilation error
otherwise).
It's a naming issue mostly. If DSF is renamed to something like
DatagramSocketSupplier then it might be a bit clearer. We have something
similar in PrintSupportedOptions - I was reminded of that with the
changes for ADQ that are currently under discussion here.
-Alan.
