On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 11:15:53 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can I please get a review for this change which proposes to address > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311032? > > The commit in this PR skips the class lookups when the package name prefix is > empty, either due to the `java.protocol.handler.pkgs` system property value > being empty or due to individual parts of the `|` delimited value being empty. > > This avoids potentially expensive classloading attempts for a class name of > the form `.foo.Handler`, which is bound to fail. > > No new jtreg test has been added given the nature of the change. There's > already an existing test > `test/jdk/java/net/URL/HandlersPkgPrefix/HandlersPkgPrefix.java` which tests > different values for the `java.protocol.handler.pkgs` system property > (including empty value) and that test continues to pass with this change. > > tier testing is currently in progress. Thank you Alan and Daniel for reviewing this change. tier1, tier2 and tier3 testing with this change came back without any failures. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14693#issuecomment-1612304943
