On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:36:23 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to fix 
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8326381?
>> 
>> As noted in the JBS issue, the implementation in `setNeedClientAuth()` and 
>> `setWantClientAuth()` of `com.sun.net.httpserver.HttpsParameters` wasn't 
>> matching the API specification. The commit in this PR fixes that issue and 
>> it now matches the API specification as well as what is done in 
>> `javax.net.ssl.SSLParameters` class.
>> 
>> Additionally, as noted in the JBS issue, the (internal class) 
>> `sun.net.httpserver.SSLStreams` had a bug where it could end up resetting 
>> the `needClientAuth` flag on the `SSLEngine` because of the way the 
>> `setNeedClientAuth()` and `setWantClientAuth()` methods were being called on 
>> the `SSLEngine`. This too has been fixed in this PR.
>> 
>> A new jtreg test has been introduced to reproduce the issue in the 
>> `HttpsParameters` class and verify this fix.
>
> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - John's review - set need/wantClientAuth to false and expect both 
> need/wantClientAuth to be false
>  - assert that client auth was indeed initiated by server during TLS handshake

test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/HttpsParametersClientAuthTest.java line 236:

> 234:                         Throwable cause = ioe;
> 235:                         while (cause != null) {
> 236:                             // either of SocketException or 
> SSLHandshakeException are OK

I have this on my TODO list and I plan to come back to this shortly after I am 
done with the CSR text. I was expecting this to be one specific type of 
exception but I'm seeing 2 different types depending on how I launch the test. 
Plus there's an open PR in security-libs area which is proposing some changes 
in the alert/exception raised from the TLS handshake layer when the client 
doesn't send certificates to the server. I need to review those changes to see 
what kind of impact if any that change will have here.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17940#discussion_r1502482513

Reply via email to