> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to enhance the 
> implementation of `ServerSocket` and `ServerSocketChannel` to allow for 
> `backlog` values to be greater than 200 on Windows? This addresses 
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8330940.
> 
> As noted in that enhancement request, right now on Windows, if the backlog is 
> specified to be more than 200, then Windows caps it to a platform internal 
> `SOMAXCONN`. As noted in the documentation here 
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winsock2/nf-winsock2-listen
>  applications can increase that limit by using the `SOMAXCONN_HINT` macro. 
> That macro then adjusts the value to be between 200 and 65535, thus allowing 
> for a higher backlog of connections.
> 
> The commit in this PR uses this macro when the specified backlog is 200 or 
> more. A new jtreg test has been introduced to verify this change. This test 
> and other existing tests in tier1, tier2 and tier3 continue to pass.
> 
> A similar restriction on the backlog value applies in Linux too 
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst#tcp-variables.
>  But from what I can see, unlike Windows, it cannot be adjusted when calling 
> `listen()`.

Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional 
commits since the last revision:

 - include a test for AsynchronousServerSocketChannel
 - System.err instead of System.out
 - trim down code comment
 -  > 200 instead of >= 200

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25819/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25819/files/b5fb869a..eb77b5e3

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=25819&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=25819&range=00-01

  Stats: 25 lines in 2 files changed: 14 ins; 4 del; 7 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25819.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25819/head:pull/25819

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25819

Reply via email to