On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 10:41:58 GMT, Volkan Yazici <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Adds a new `ofFileChannel(FileChannel channel, long offset, long length)`
>> method to `java.net.HttpRequest.BodyPublishers` to provide an `HttpClient`
>> publisher to upload a certain region of a file. The new publisher does not
>> modify the state of the passed `FileChannel`, streams the file channel bytes
>> as it publishes (i.e., avoids reading the entire file into the memory), and
>> can be leveraged to implement sliced uploads. As noted in the Javadoc:
>>
>>> The file channel will not be closed upon completion. The caller is
>>> expected to manage the life cycle of the channel, and close it
>>> appropriately when not needed anymore.
>>
>> ### Implementation notes
>>
>> - `FileChannel` is preferred over `{Readable,Seekable}ByteChannel`, since
>> the latter does not provide a positional read without modifying the state of
>> the `FileChannel`, which is necessary to use a single `FileChannel` instance
>> to implement sliced uploads.
>> - `ofFileChannel(FileChannel,long,long)` is preferred over
>> `ofPath(Path,long,long)` to avoid overloading the maximum file descriptor
>> limit of the platform.
>
> Volkan Yazici has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Improve docs on `IndexOutOfBoundsException` thrown
>
> Co-authored-by: Daniel Fuchs <[email protected]>
src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/RequestPublishers.java
line 492:
> 490: if (readLength < 0) {
> 491: // We *must* throw to signal that the request needs
> to be cancelled.
> 492: // Otherwise, the server will continue waiting data.
The comment itself is a good idea but i think we should leave out the reference
to a "server" from this comment. Perhaps something like: "Throw to signal that
the request needs to be cancelled"?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26155#discussion_r2213382091
