> Adds a new `ofFileChannel(FileChannel channel, long offset, long length)` 
> method to `java.net.HttpRequest.BodyPublishers` to provide an `HttpClient` 
> publisher to upload a certain region of a file. The new publisher does not 
> modify the state of the passed `FileChannel`, streams the file channel bytes 
> as it publishes (i.e., avoids reading the entire file into the memory), and 
> can be leveraged to implement sliced uploads. As noted in the Javadoc:
> 
>> The file channel will not be closed upon completion. The caller is
>> expected to manage the life cycle of the channel, and close it
>> appropriately when not needed anymore.
> 
> ### Implementation notes
> 
> - `FileChannel` is preferred over `{Readable,Seekable}ByteChannel`, since the 
> latter does not provide a positional read without modifying the state of the 
> `FileChannel`, which is necessary to use a single `FileChannel` instance to 
> implement sliced uploads.
> - `ofFileChannel(FileChannel,long,long)` is preferred over 
> `ofPath(Path,long,long)` to avoid overloading the maximum file descriptor 
> limit of the platform.

Volkan Yazici has updated the pull request incrementally with six additional 
commits since the last revision:

 - Fix typo in `Utils::getBufferWithAtMost` Javadoc
 - Link to `BUFSIZE` in `Utils::getBuffer` Javadoc
 - Improve wording for signaling request cancellation
 - Remove synchronization for `FileChannelIterator`
 - Improve exception handling and documentation for `ofFileChannel`
 - Add `@since 26` to `ofFileChannel`

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26155/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26155/files/3af61c5f..da698406

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=26155&range=03
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=26155&range=02-03

  Stats: 28 lines in 3 files changed: 9 ins; 9 del; 10 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26155.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26155/head:pull/26155

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26155

Reply via email to