On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 15:16:32 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Well that's an interesting question. The RFC does not suggest clamping >> wMaxBytes in any way, so we sometimes do end up with wMaxBytes < >> congestionWindow, and kNanos < 0, even in the `testReduction` test. That >> seems to be in line with the RFC. >> >> A negative `k` value is pretty well tolerated by the algorithm. It just >> means that we will start increasing the window slightly faster than we would >> otherwise. > > OK then. Could be worth adding a comment that kNanos can be negative and that > it is OK. Comment added. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28195#discussion_r2549250174
