On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 16:28:30 GMT, Mikhail Yankelevich <[email protected]> wrote:
>> We have a Linux machine with IPV6 disabled. >> There the test javax/net/ssl/HttpsURLConnection/SubjectAltNameIP.java fails. >> Error is >> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: Server failed to start. >> at SubjectAltNameIP.doClientSide(SubjectAltNameIP.java:139) >> at SubjectAltNameIP.<init>(SubjectAltNameIP.java:189) >> at SubjectAltNameIP.main(SubjectAltNameIP.java:176) >> at >> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:104) >> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:565) >> at >> com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.MainWrapper$MainTask.run(MainWrapper.java:138) >> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1516) >> Caused by: java.net.SocketException: Protocol family unavailable >> >> >> After looking into the test, it turned out the IPV6 address `::1` was >> passed in the notion `[::1] `to the isIPv6LiteralAddress, but this method >> must get the address without '[' and ']' . >> Additionally I adjusted the exception a bit so that it directly mentions >> IPV6 and not just some 'protol family' . > > test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/HttpsURLConnection/SubjectAltNameIP.java line 26: > >> 24: /* >> 25: * @test >> 26: * @bug 8369950 > > nit: could you please add this bug id to the `@bug` annotation here I don't think that's useful. The implementation changes are unrelated. It could be better to mark the JBS issue with one of the `noreg` labels. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28825#discussion_r2620096550
