I just want everyone to know that I was not going for a Phine Wine below; Just would like to know if there are others in the audience who use Net-SNMP running on OpenBSD or NetBSD, and if those readers have some time to try the patches in patch #969338, just to verify that the OpenBSD or NetBSD platforms are not negatively impacted by those patches.
Thanks! -Mike Slifcak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't really want to muck further with which data structure has > what member. On FreeBSD 5.x, both "struct statfs" and "struct statvfs" > have member "f_free". On FreeBSD 4.9, there is no "struct statvfs". > I have no idea what would work for NetBSD or OpenBSD, so I would like > to get off the merry-go-round now. > > I withdraw the fancy patch, and include a simpler variant > of the HACK-patch seen earlier in this channel. > > It in fact allows both FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE and FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE > to build successfully. > > I would hope that other developers step up and try these changes, > and send comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > My volunteered time has exceeded my quota for the week.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: GNOME Foundation Hackers Unite! GUADEC: The world's #1 Open Source Desktop Event. GNOME Users and Developers European Conference, 28-30th June in Norway http://2004/guadec.org _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
