David,
Thanks for such a quick answer.
So you should treat the variables in both notifications and reqeust/
response with the same manner. Is that correct?
Then the agent I mentioned seems right.
Norio Nakamoto
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:14:25 -0700
"David T. Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> san wrote:
> HI,
>
> Variables in notifications (TRAPv1, TRAPv2, INFORM) always have instance
> sub-ids. If they are scalars, it's always 0. For columnar, you
> have to look at the INDEX or AUGMENTS clause of the row definition.
> A well written DESCRIPTION clause will make it obvious which instance
> is returned. You NEVER need to define notifications to return
> the index values as separate objects.
>
> At 10:02 AM 7/17/2004 +0900, Norio Nakamoto wrote:
> ><stuff cut>
>
> >I also noticed one agent set valiable bindings such as ifIndex and ifDescr
> >in LinkUp/Down traps but they are bound with OID like 'ifIndex.10' and
> >'ifDescr.10'.
> >Is this acceptable? According to RFC 1157, I think they should be
> >only 'ifIndex' and 'ifDescr' (without index key).
> >
> >Norio Nakamoto
> Regards,
> /david t. perkins
,,,
(o o)
+------------------oOO--(_)--OOo----------------+
| Norio Nakamoto |
| 2nd Development Dept., IP Systems Division |
| Fujitsu Network Technologies Ltd. |
| e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+-----------------------------------------------+
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
