On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:57:13 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> The libwrap calls check against "snmpd" if there's an address string, DS> but "snmp" it there isn't. Is this difference intentional? If so, why?
Well, that change can be tracked to John: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/net-snmp/net-snmp/agent/snmp_agent.c?r1=1.181&r2=1.182 - add libwrap support to snmptrapd (untested) - minor changes to snmpd libwrap support - configure fixes for libwrap Looking at the diff, it looks like a typo (the opposite of a cut-n-paste error). I can't imagine why there would be a different check. John, any ideas? -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
