On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:56:55 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> I found that somewhat easier to understand than OpenSNMP (sorry Robert!)
Doesn't bother me. I came onto that project rather late in the game, so Wes is more likely to be offended than me. Though in his defence, I will say that the project was somewhat constrained in that it was meant to follow the processing model outlined in the SNMPv3 RFCs. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
