On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:54:45 +0200 Thomas wrote: TA> Wes Hardaker wrote: TA> > In the future, if you submit a patch please don't submit it to the bug TA> > database. It's easier to sort through patches where fixes are known. TA> > Finding patches in the bug database is difficult. TA> TA> What if one submits a bug report and develops a patch for it later? TA> Shall he attach it to the existing bug report or rather submit it as TA> a new patch with cross references between the two? People have done TA> both in the past, but what do you actually prefer?
I actually prefer to have the patch with the bug. However, the sf site will only let the submitter of a bug attach files, thus the frequent use of the patch tracker as well. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
