Ganga>  I have a requirement of doing snmpget on multiple ip address for the
Ganga>  same objectid. 

Thomas> .... there'd probably be an argument
Thomas> for not restricting it to GET only.

Robert> I can see it for the single request operations: get, set, getnext
Robert> and snmptrap. I'm not so sure about snmpgetbulk or snmpwalk.

Just a minor point - snmpgetbulk *is* a single request operation.
It's "snmpbulkwalk" that's the other "multi-request" command.

I'm also a little uncomfortable about doing this with "snmpset" in particular.
Would it need to apply the same "all-or-nothing" behaviour as a single SET 
request?
Or would it be acceptable for some requests to succeed, and others to fail?
If so, then the error reporting would need to be crafted very carefully.

Returning to the general concept, should this also support a "broadcast"
mode? - an idea that's mentioned at fairly regular intervals.

Dave



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to