On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 02:50:39 -0400 Michael wrote: MJS> Please review bug [ 1040429 ] memory leaked past f_fmtaddr calls MJS> Please review bug [ 1040431 ] transport addrs not consistent MJS> [...] MJS> I would suggest that these changes provide good benefit MJS> and represent low risk.
It seems reasonable, but I'm hoping John will jump in here, since he's the one who did all the transport stuff... It seems to me that it might also make sense to move the host_clt stuff into the transport code itself. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
