Quoting Alex Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Wes> I disagree. I don't think we should double use [blah] directives. Wes> Right now, the [blah] directives are reserved for application types. Wes> Making this potentially collide with host names would be confusing and Wes> prone to errors when real host names collide with application types.
Alex> How about if [blah] was changed to [xxx blah] where xxx could be Alex> 'type' or 'host' That's not a bad idea. I'd probably prefer "app" rather than "type", but that's a relatively minor thing. The basic concept is reasonable. [Which is probably about as positive as you're likely to get from me!] But I'm not at all sure that it's sensible to try and rush this into 5.2. We're slipping later and later.... Dave ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
