On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:52:00 +0000 Dave wrote: DS> Secondly, I've tweaked the stash-cache handler to automatically DS> inject the new stash-to-next handler into the chain if it DS> detects that this is needed. This involved manipulating the DS> 'next' and 'prev' links directly, which feels: DS> a) ugly, and DS> b) potentially unsafe DS> Can you suggest a better way?
Maybe netsnmp_inject_handler_before() ? -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
