On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 14:37, Robert Story wrote: > On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:52:00 +0000 Dave wrote: > DS> Secondly, I've tweaked the stash-cache handler to automatically > DS> inject the new stash-to-next handler into the chain if it > DS> detects that this is needed. This involved manipulating the > DS> 'next' and 'prev' links directly, which feels: > DS> a) ugly, and > DS> b) potentially unsafe > DS> Can you suggest a better way? > > Maybe netsnmp_inject_handler_before() ?
I wondered about that. The main reason I didn't use that API is that it seemed a bit inefficient to search the handler chain when I already knew where I wanted the new handler to go! Maybe we need a new routine "netsnmp_inject_handler_here" (or "netsnmp_inject_handler_after") which takes a handler pointer, rather than a name? There's still the question of whether it's safe to meddle with the handler chain while it's "active". Wes? Dave ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
