I vote go for it (with something in README or NEWS explaining the issue). WH>5.2 currently contains code to support the inetCidrRouteTable from the WH>IP-FORWARD-MIB. However, the updated mib isn't from an RFC yet though WH>it's in the RFC editor's queue to become one (IE, its [sic]done being WH>revised) and thus I think we should publish it with 5.2.1 since we WH>have code that implements part of it. Support? Objections?
This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal and or privileged information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take action relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
