>>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:52:02 -0400, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Robert> Unfortunately, I made a poor decision for the default priority Robert> used by the wrapper function (I used 0). The way the code is Robert> written, anyone wanting a particular callback to be called Robert> before the default must use a negative priority. In a rare case, I actually am ok with this change. I don't think it'll affect almost? anyone, and thus is probably safe and the benefits outweigh those they've used it. However, questions: 1) has any mib2c.conf file produced code that used the API that someone may have twiddled with, or is it something they had to intentionally use? 2) does the current API allow for negative numbers in the API, or is unsigned currently? I don't see a problem with negative numbers. negative numbers for priority levels are actually quiet common in API sets. unix-nice, iptables, etc all have negative numbers for priority levels and it's common. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
