On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 16:57, Robert Story wrote: > I believe so. I seem to recall that it broke the snmpd.conf 'table' token. > Wes also pointed out that anyone wanting to look at the data itself would have > been using the linked list pointers, thus breaking backwards compatibility.
Hmmm.... where was this discussed? I'd deliberately stayed subscribed to the coders list for just this sort of eventuality, but don't remember seeing anything. (Somewhat to my surprise - I'd half expected Wes to squeal loudly). And a quick search of the users and CVS lists didn't turn up anything either. > DS> Otherwise, I might look at making the new name a little more > DS> distinctive, to more clearly distinguish it from the old. > > I did give him a hard time about the name. I agree that the new one sucks. Yup - I'm not too happy about that at all. I never much liked the 'data/dataset' names anyway. If we're going to change them, I'd like a say in what to! Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
