On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:18:10 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> > Not being on the admin list, I'd strongly vote for the -coder list.
DS> 
DS> In preference to having a separate mailing list?
DS>    (e.g. "net-snmp-testing")
DS> 
DS> I think it's clear that the admin list is the wrong place for this.

As long as we seed the subscription with the admin list, that's ok. My concern
with a separate list is that the admins won't subscribe. Maybe a time threshold
(say 3 days) for adding a CC to the admin list if the build hasn't been fixed?

-- 
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>

You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.  How far can you shotput
a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track?
If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy.  
Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to