On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:05:55 -0400 Robert wrote: RS> On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:34:12 -0400 Robert wrote: RS> RS> On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:39:18 +0200 Thomas wrote: RS> RS> TA> > Didn't we change code to delay SNMPv3 engine probe recently, RS> RS> TA> > Robert? RS> RS> TA> RS> RS> TA> Backing out Robert's change in snmplib/snmp_api.c between revisions RS> RS> TA> 5.73 and 5.74 brings "make test" back to "49 / 49 succeeded" for RS> RS> TA> me. RS> RS> RS> RS> doh! sigh. Back to the drawing board... RS> RS> Ok, I've just checked in fixes that work correctly for incoming engineID RS> probes and delayed engineID probes for trapSess. I now get much better RS> results for make test, though not the full 49. Haven't looked at the other RS> failures yet...
I checked in fixes yesterday that get me up to 48/49.. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
