On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 17:47, Robert Story wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:27:13 +0100 Dave wrote:
> DS> <asm/types.h> is needed for RH9, and should be safe enough under Fedora. > DS> But it doesn't feel quite right, somehow.... > > On YellowDog (Fedora-ish ppc clone), that gets me __u8, but not u8. Same on Fedora. On RH9, it has both __u8 *and* u8. (though only if __KERNEL__ is defined) I'm wondering whether it might not be safer to define these typedefs ourselves... Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
