sorry i didnt mean that.
i want to use the async interface without making this
call synchronous as this daemon is responsible for
other things as well.
thanks
ATG
--- Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Srinivas
> wrote:
> SA> I cannt make it synchronous.
>
> Sure you can. Instead of calling xxx_async(), write
> a wrapper:
>
> int xxx_sync()
> {
> rc = xxx_async();
> if(rc) handle_error();
> rc = xxx_wait_for_async_results();
> if(rc) handle_error();
> return rc;
> }
>
> --
> NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the
> lists, will be deleted
> unless they are requests for paid consulting
> services.
>
> Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
> Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
> Archive:
>
<http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
>
> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards,
> all different.
>
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September
19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
