On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:05:22 -0700 (PDT) Srinivas wrote:
SA> sorry i didnt mean that.
SA> i want to use the async interface without making this
SA> call synchronous as this daemon is responsible for
SA> other things as well.
I didn't mean make the daemon synchronous, I mean make the sub-agent call to
the daemon synchronous.
There just aren't any hooks in the baby-steps handler to interrupt a set
request in mid-processing to wait for a response. In theory, it should be
doable, but given that the top level processing blocks on a set request
anyway, I don't see the point.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
