On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:46:28 +0200 Thomas wrote:
TA> Robert Story wrote:
TA> > I'm a little concerned that Thomas seems to think this is already fixed,
TA> > but Dave has checked in a fix. I tend to avoid the v3 stuff when I can,
TA> > so I just want to see if some double checking is called for?
TA>
TA> I'm referring to Wes' fixes discussed in this thread:
Maybe I'm confused... I just re-read Dave's message:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:41:06 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> The current version of the code uses 'times()', which returns
DS> the uptime since an arbitrary point (typically when the system
DS> booted). This *is* portable, and should address your concerns.
DS>
DS> This fix has been applied to the 5.1.x, 5.2.x and current
DS> development lines. Can you please try one of these versions,
DS> and confirm whether the problem is still present.
So, maybe he is referring to Wes' fixes, and not the uptime in seconds
function that was being batted about. Dave, is that right? The 'fix' you were
referring to was not something you checked in, but a difference between old
code and current code?
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
