Hi Dave, > I can sort-of see an argument for distinguishing the 5.2.x line, > given this is still being actively maintained. But 5.1.x is > basically winding down, and 5.0.x is completely closed. So I'm > unconvinced that it's worth distinguishing between the two at > this late stage.
I would also opt for this solution. So libnetsnmp.so.5 would be 5.0.x and 5.1.x (there is no known incompatibility between those two versions and they are depreciated anyways). libnetsnmp.so.5.2 would be 5.2.x (x>1) and libnetsnmp.so.5.3 would be 5.3.x, etc. Thanks, Jochen ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
