>>>>> On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 15:22:38 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> The underlying idea of restricting access to different categories Dave> of action (separately configurable) is probably sensible enough. Dave> But trying to shoehorn this into the existing VACM table is Just Dave> Plain Wrong. Dave> If we're going to do this, then let's Do It Right. There's actually no reason why we can't use this as a temp solution and then later do the right thing either. I do agree, it's not the ideal solution. But the ideal one will take a significantly greater amount of time to design and implement. And I don't think we can get it done before 5.3 (mainly due to ensuing arguments I'm sure will happen), and I don't think we should let 5.3 go out without something in place. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
