On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 23:14:43 +0200 Thomas wrote: TA> Robert Story wrote: TA> > move to libtool recommended versioning scheme TA> TA> Why jump up to c:r:a==9:0:0?
Because that's what Wes proposed. Initially, I thought of just going to 6:0:0, since everything currently uses lib*.so.5, but if you look at the previous version, you'll see that 5 is determined from current-age, so it 5.2.1 was 7:2:1. Thus 8 is the next free number, which Wes proposed using for the 5.1.x line. Thus 9 for 5.2, and 10 for 5.3. I don't know that using 6 as current, after a previous release using 7 with an age of 2, would have caused problems, so the safest path was to avoid all overlap and jump to 8/9/10. Since we aren't mapping to releases any more, the numbers don't matter. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
