>>>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:11:24 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Wes> Mostly this should effect just the monitor token. Dave> Yup. That one's already mostly in place (but extended). It's the Dave> other tokens (defaultMonitors, etc) that still need to be added. defaultMonitors will likely still work unless you've broke the syntax of the monitor command. defaultMonitors actually is a wrapper around multiple "monitors" token calls. Wes> 2) It truly does implement everything that is there now, which I don't Wes> think it does. You said it does, Dave> <sigh> Dave> No - I said: Dave> This implementation isn't fully complete.... Dave> .... But it should be sufficiently operational Dave> to be able to compare it sensibly against the existing code. Dave> ^^^^^^^ Dave> It's not ready to replace your code yet, but there's enough to get a Dave> feeling for the two. You've often whinged at me for holding back and Dave> submitting everything in one go - you keep trying to encourage me to Dave> submit early and often. Now maybe you see why I tend not to! No no no... I understood it wasn't fully complete. I think my assumption was that since you wanted it to be the replacement for 5.3 that it would be closer so you could achieve that. However, I suspect you can anyway. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
