On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:17:49 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> There's
DS> nothing inherently different between that situation, and a pair
DS> of 'agentSecName'/'iquerySecName' settings.
Yes there is - mainly that the user has no idea that they are referring to the
same thing!
DS> I'm inclined to rely on proper documentation instead.
What happens if someone has an existing conf file, upgrades, sees
the new token (or is cutting and pasting from some googled example), and adds
it. It is possible that something set up by the first token would be confused
or get broken by the appearance of the second? eg
agentSecName wallace
monitor ....
...
iquerySecName grommit
monitor ****
Would both monitor statements work?
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
