On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:04:40 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> What I'd like to see is a separation (or partial separation) of DS> the MIB module configuration, from the configuration of the DS> overall package. If I want to add a new MIB module to the agent, DS> it shouldn't be necessary to recompile the library as well!
Yes, I agree. I think we've had this discussion before. DS> But I can't help feeling we're getting a bit sidetracked. DS> I suspect that Thomas was asking for guidance on what should DS> be done in the immediate future, rather than more significant DS> (and probably longer-term) design changes. True.. DS> > [ ] build [stripped down] libnetsnmpagent Add 1 here for me.. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
