Dave Shield wrote:
This patch isn't quite as trivial as some other "last minute"
fixes. But it seems sensible enough, and given that we'll need
another cycle at RC-status anyway, I'm happy to vote that it
should go in.
I'd have no major problem leaving the (IMHO superfluous)
pcb.inp_fport = htons(pcb.inp_fport);
line in (and eliminate it *post* 5.2.2) if that addresses some concerns.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
