On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 15:54 +0200, Thomas Anders wrote: > I'd have no major problem leaving the (IMHO superfluous) > > pcb.inp_fport = htons(pcb.inp_fport); > > line in (and eliminate it *post* 5.2.2) if that addresses some concerns.
No - that's fine. My concern was that I didn't understand it - not that I wanted it kept in. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
