On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 10:48 -0500, Robert Story wrote:
> DS> I'm also concerned about how many changes seem to be being made in the
> DS> supposed 5.2.2 "release candidate", without discussion.
>
> This is one of the reasons I suggested we move to 5.2.3.pre instead
> of staying with the rc name. But I was overruled that time.
I thought there was a general agreement over "{something}.preN",
but with various opinions about what the "{something}" should be?
I'd also thought that we'd agreed on "5.2.2.pre4", though nothing
seemed to happen wrt that.
But the main reason for dropping down from rc-status was the
difficulty over snmpnetstat licensing. That should now have been
resolved (assuming my re-write is generally acceptable - and I
haven't heard anything to the contrary).
So we really ought to be back at rc-status again, with the intention
of getting this out ASAP.
As far as the 5.3 stuff is concerned, I may have got the wrong idea.
You seemed to be talking about breaking backwards compatibility,
and moving things from one library to another. That felt more
than simply fixing bugs, which is why I queried it.
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
