Dave Shield wrote:
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 16:35 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
Dave Shield wrote:
The current test suite is *much* better than it was, but I don't
think that the "snmpwalk" test is sufficiently focused to be very
useful.
I think it fills a gap that the more focused tests leave.
How can you say that?
I haven't *written* the more focused tests yet!
:-)
Rephrased: I think it *currently* fills a gap that the other *existing*
tests leave. (And as such, it's IMHO *currently* quite useful)
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
