>>>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:30:35 -0800 (PST), "David T. Perkins" <[EMAIL 
>>>>> PROTECTED]> said:

David> By the way, the StorageType TC is pretty broken (fatally flawed)
David> in it's assumptions. That is, really doesn't match the semantics
David> of real systems. I hope that the work that is being done by
David> NET-SNMP is not based on trying to duplicate that semantics
David> of the StorageType TC.

We have a wide mix of different types of storage "thingeys" that
sometimes map ok to the TC and sometimes don't.  We're not talking
about the ST TC at all at the moment (some code that uses the ST TC
has to map to our system, but it's been done many times and is compatible)

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to